Skip to content

Starbucks. Scale that diluted the core

Area: Scaling · Model node: Process

An analysis of a public company using open sources. This is not an EMET client case.

Context

In the 2000s Starbucks opened coffee shops very fast. To serve more guests, the company sped up its processes: it installed automatic espresso machines, sold coffee in sealed packaging and expanded the menu with hot sandwiches.

Symptom

In February 2007 chairman Howard Schultz, who had turned Starbucks into a coffee chain, wrote an internal memo, "The Commoditization of the Starbucks Experience." In his words, the tall automatic machines hid the barista's work from the guest, and the sealed packaging took the smell of freshly ground coffee out of the shops. The memo leaked to the press.

Cause

Each decision made for speed and efficiency was reasonable on its own. Together they removed from the coffee shop what guests paid more for than for ordinary coffee: the sense of craft and of place. Growth was measured by the number of new locations, not by what happened in each of them.

The fork

Keep opening coffee shops at the same pace, or stop and bring back what the brand rested on.

Decision

In January 2008 Schultz returned as chief executive. The company slowed the opening of new shops and turned to quality in the existing ones.

Execution

On February 26, 2008 Starbucks closed 7,100 coffee shops in the United States for about three and a half hours to retrain baristas in making espresso. On July 1, 2008 the company announced the closure of about 600 underperforming shops in the United States, roughly 8 percent of the chain.

Outcome

The company cut costs, brought attention back to the product and the guest experience, and returned to growth in the following years. The 2008 closures became a textbook example of how scale needs a system that keeps quality in every location.

What it means for you

You can only scale what already works and is written down. If every new location is slightly worse than the last, growth gradually eats what customers pay for.

  • What exactly do customers pay you more for than your competitors?
  • How much of that survives in each new location, branch or team?
  • Which decisions made for speed have already removed part of your value to the customer?

We would start by comparing the best and the worst locations of the network on the same metrics and finding what sets them apart in practice.

Key dates

YearEvent
2007, FebruarySchultz's memo "The Commoditization of the Starbucks Experience"
2008, JanuarySchultz returns as chief executive
2008, February 267,100 US coffee shops closed for barista training
2008, July 1Closure of about 600 US coffee shops announced

Sources

  • Starbucks Corp. Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1, July 2008 (store closures): Source
  • Starbucks Corp. Form 8-K, January 2008 (Schultz's return): Source
  • NPR. *Starbucks To Close 600 Stores*, July 2, 2008: Source
  • Harvard Business School Working Knowledge. *Starbucks Reinvented*: Source
  • Howard Schultz. *Onward: How Starbucks Fought for Its Life without Losing Its Soul*. Rodale, 2011.

Next case analysis: Amazon. Operations as an advantage →

More cases and articles

Article · 5 min

Delegation that doesn't fall apart

Most attempts to delegate fail because of the structure, not the people: the task gets handed over, but the decision doesn't.

Read: Delegation that doesn't fall apart

Let's start with your situation.