Skip to content

Netflix. Changing the model while the old one still works

Area: Business Transformation · Model node: Strategy

An analysis of a public company using open sources. This is not an EMET client case.

Context

Netflix launched its DVD-by-mail rental website in April 1998, and in 1999 it moved to a subscription without late fees. In 2000 the company offered itself to Blockbuster for $50 million, and Blockbuster declined. By the mid-2000s rental by mail had become a profitable business.

Symptom

DVD rental kept growing, but internet speeds and the spread of devices made delivering films over the network a matter of a few years. The profitable model could become obsolete before it stopped making money.

Cause

The economics of rental by mail rested on physical logistics: warehouses, envelopes, postage. These advantages were worth nothing in digital delivery, where the rules were set by content licenses and technology.

The fork

Protect the profitable model while it is growing, or invest in the next one at the risk of weakening current income.

Decision

In January 2007 Netflix launched online viewing as an addition to the DVD subscription. For several years the company ran both models in parallel and gradually moved its investment into streaming.

Execution

The transition was not smooth. In 2011 the company changed its prices and announced that DVD rental would be split into a separate service, Qwikster. Customers saw this as a change for the worse, and the company lost hundreds of thousands of subscribers. A month later Qwikster was dropped. In 2013 the first original series, House of Cards, was released, and in 2016 the service became available in 130 new countries.

Outcome

Streaming became Netflix's core business, and DVD rental by mail kept running until September 2023. For more than fifteen years the company ran two models at once.

What it means for you

A transformation starts while the old model still pays for the transition. Mistakes are inevitable, as Qwikster showed, but they cost less than being late.

  • Which part of your model still makes money but is no longer growing?
  • Where is technology changing the rules in your industry?
  • What are you postponing because the current model still works?

We would start by splitting revenue into the growing part and the aging part, and calculating how many years the aging part can fund the transition.

Key dates

YearEvent
1998, AprilDVD-by-mail rental website launches
1999Move to a subscription
2000Offer to sell the company to Blockbuster for $50 million; Blockbuster declines
2007, JanuaryOnline viewing launches
2011Price change and the Qwikster episode
2013, FebruaryHouse of Cards, the first original series
2016, JanuaryLaunch in 130 new countries
2023, SeptemberDVD rental closes

Sources

  • Wikipedia. *Timeline of Netflix*: Source
  • CNBC. *Netflix didn't kill Blockbuster — how Netflix almost lost the movie rental wars*, September 22, 2020: Source

Next case analysis: Blockbuster. Protect the store chain or make it to the new model in time →

More cases and articles

Public company case analysis

Yahoo

In 2008 Yahoo turned down Microsoft's offer. Nine years later its core business was sold to Verizon for $4.48 billion. An analysis of how to evaluate an offer to buy.

Read case analysis: Yahoo

Let's start with your situation.